logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.07.22 2014고단444
유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On December 6, 2013, the Suwon District Court sentenced 6 months of imprisonment for embezzlement and 2 years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on December 6, 2013.

Defendant

A was the person responsible for the Masan Center at the same time who was the tourr, and Defendant B was the person who established the above EMasan Center and the person in charge of Defendant A’s upper level.

No one shall be allowed to make an agreement to pay the total amount of contributions or an amount exceeding such amount of contributions in the future to an unspecified number of persons without obtaining authorization, permission, making registration, or making a report pursuant to Acts and subordinate statutes and to pay the total amount of contributions or the amount exceeding such amount of contributions in the future as a business of importing contributions.

Nevertheless, around December 5, 2010, Defendant A recommended the investment of Defendant A to the effect that Defendant A would attract investors, and Defendant A would make an investment with the victim F at the above “E office to Korea as an international travel agent located in the United States and have its head office in Seoul.” Defendant B would pay the principal and interest of 120% when investing money in this place. Defendant B also recommended the investment with Defendant A in the same purport.

Therefore, the Defendants received 700,000 won from the victim F, from that time until January 201, and received the total of 9,5640,000 won from seven investors via 15 times as shown in the annexed crime list, from that time.

As a result, Defendants engaged in the business of fund-raising without obtaining authorization, permission, registration, report, etc. under Acts and subordinate statutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement to F, G, H, I, and J. 1.

arrow