1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: The real estate listed in the annexed sheet No. 1;

B. Defendant C shall provide the real estate listed in the Appendix 3 list.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment project partnership whose project implementation district is the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I.

B. The head of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government approved the management and disposition plan on September 1, 2015 regarding the housing redevelopment improvement project implemented by the Plaintiff, and approved it around that time.

C. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet is located in the project implementation district. Defendant B is the owner of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1; Defendant D is the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 5; Defendant G and H are the owners of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 11; Defendant C is the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3; and Defendant F is each lessee of the real estate listed in the separate sheet

The Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication with Defendant F, who is conducting business in the name of “J user” in the real estate listed in the attached Table 10 list, as the Plaintiff did not reach an agreement on the business compensation, and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal rendered a ruling of expropriation on December 18, 2015 at the commencement date of expropriation on February 5, 2016.

On January 26, 2016, according to the above acceptance ruling, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 21,621,000 for business compensation in the future of Defendant F.

E. Defendant B, D, G, and H applied for parcelling-out to the Plaintiff, the owner, but they did not enter into a contract with the Plaintiff during the period of the parcelling-out contract (from September 20, 2016 to September 26, 2016) and changed to a cash settlement.

On June 23, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication because it did not consult with the said Defendants on compensation, and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal rendered a ruling of expropriation on August 11, 2017.

On July 19, 2017, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 474,462,950 for the Defendant B’s compensation for losses, ② KRW 456,172,450 for the Defendant D’s compensation for losses, ③ Defendant G and H, respectively, KRW 77,752,050 for each compensation for losses in the future.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 16 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers), Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The cause of the action.