The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant, around July 26, 2017, 19:00, while drinking alcohol in a “C cafeteria” restaurant located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around July 26, 201, he/she must sell it to the said C cafeteria by the victim D.

Whether it will be a funeral service for drinking only

“I think that the injured person was referred to as “,” and think that the injured person was referred to as the Defendant, and b) I think that the F, etc. of the E-cafeteria in the vicinity of the above C cafeteria is so large that the F, etc. of the E-cafeteria, in the vicinity of the above C cafeteria, b) the injured person “I ambling on the part of the damaged person in the har

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by openly tamping the chrop hyp.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are acts falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which may be prosecuted only upon a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

In such a case, the complainant may recognize the cancellation of the complaint against the defendant on October 13, 2017, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.