A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 12, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol on 0.108% of the blood alcohol concentration, driven a vehicle of approximately 1 km from the front of a mutually influorous convenience store located in the Gyeongbuk-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnambuk-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, in the direction of 0.10%.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those who are engaged in driving of Erodox.

On June 13:10 on June 12, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraph (1), driven the said van, and led to the following three-lanes of three lanes: (a) the Drout-type and front roads in the Glurg-gun C in the Glurg-gun C in the Glurg-gun of the Glurg-gun of the Glurg-do.

Since a motor vehicle ahead of the right side of the front is driven, there was a duty of care to safely operate the steering system and the steering system in a safe speed and method.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so, and neglected to do so, and thereby, received the part on the left side of the victim F.F. (F.30 years old), which was driven on the right side of the same direction, and then received the part on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of business as seen above, sustained injury to the said victim F, such as salt panion, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and sustained injury to the victim H (H and 43 years of age) who was on the head of the said Lone Star Roex, for about two weeks of treatment, such as light salt panion, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and escaped as it did not take measures such as immediately stopping the said Lone Star Poex to the effect that the said victim H would damage the repair cost of the said Lone Star 1,801,501 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;