A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage to property;

A. On January 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 01:00, at the street, damaged the Defendant’s repair cost to cover KRW 821,760,00 in the front of the “Dju” store located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; and (b) friendly-gu E, who performed drinking, did not take the site away from her own, and did not take the crypization of the victim E, which was parked there; and (c) laid down the main brick on the road of the victim E-owned Kankn knife, which was parked there; and (d) 821,760,00 won in the front of the knife.

B. At around 01:05 on January 14, 2015, the Defendant continued to enter the “D' store,” and destroyed property worth KRW 366,000, total market price of the victim F, such as one computer monitor, one singing-on central control terminal, one card terminal, one calculating machine, and one calculating machine, and three chemical parts and three alcoholic beverage coolants on the side of the Kabrter, along with the number of vehicles.

2. On January 14, 2015, the Defendant refused to verify the Defendant’s identity at the street, around 01:05, at the same time, the Defendant was placed in the face of the bruma cremation which was used in his/her hand, when the H of the G District at the Daegu Southern Police Station G District, which was called upon upon receipt of a report and demanded the Defendant to verify the Defendant’s identity. In addition, the Defendant was placed in the face of the bruma cremation which was used in his/her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by the Inspector H, who is a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H, F, and E;

1. Application of the provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes to collection devices damaged within the D main points, photographs of damaged knife vehicles, and written estimates;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Even though there are several criminal records of reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, it is not good that each of the crimes of this case was committed.

However, the defendant reflects his fault.