logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.06.27 2013고정454
사기
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 29, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and one year and six months for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. by the District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 7, 2012.

At around 22:30 on October 3, 201, the Defendant: (a) committed as if he would pay the drinking value to E despite the absence of an intent or ability to pay the drinking value; (b) was ordered by the Defendant from the said E that he would have paid the drinking value; and (c) the Defendant was ordered by the said E as if he would have paid the drinking value; (d) the Defendant would have received from the said E a total of KRW 330,00,000, 3300, 3200, 3200, 3300, 3300,000, 3300,000, 333

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Receipts:

1. Previous records: Criminal records, etc. inquiry reports and the application of court rulings or statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment ( Taking into account the fact that the degree of damage is not substantial, and the equality with the case that a judgment becomes final and conclusive simultaneously with the case);

arrow