(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.03.14 2012고정3464

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.03.14 2012고정3464

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00 on August 15, 2012, the Defendant: (b) had a large sound that “I will not satch the sofet the sofet the sofet the sofet the sofet the sofet the sofetetet the sofet the sofetet the sofet the sofetetet the sofet the sofetetet the sofet the sofet the sofetet the sofet the sofet the sofet the sofet

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of G and E;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to G and E;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Around August 15:00 on August 9, 2012, the Defendant sought to hold an interview with the head of a private teaching institute on the fourth floor of the F&A located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

However, while waiting for the absence of the president of a private teaching institute, the victim G (the age of 25) who works as an English instructor was found in the open lecture room, and found out the defendant's crynasium in the open lecture room, and read it at a corner, and read it at a corner, and on the ground that it was closed so far as the lecture door was able to read, the crynasium was cut off, and the crynasium was tightly tightly tightly tightly tight and tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on January 15, 2013, which is after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, this part of the indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2013.03.27 2012고정1753

-광주지방법원목포지원 2019.05.01 2018가단51066

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2020.05.13 2020고단680

-인천지방법원 2019.06.20 2019고정474

-대전지방법원 2015.08.05 2014고단2636 (1)