A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 14, 2015, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, on the ground that, while drinking alcohol together with the victim E (the age of 57) and drinking alcohol, the Defendant 500c glass bars, which are dangerous objects in the customer’s location, made 4 times the part of the victim’s left eye and quacy of the victim’s left eye, and caused damage to the victim’s hair and mama that require approximately five weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol against E;

1. Entry of the written statement of the defendant;

1. A description of a criminal investigation report (F counterpart investigation of a witness);

1. The credibility of the statements made by the victim on the victim’s standing and the upper part of the photograph of beer and the upper part [a] photograph of beer and the upper part of the photograph [a] may be recognized as consistent and concrete, because the statement made by the victim on the victim’s own will be consistent with the victim, G, and F, the process of the Defendant’s conversation before and after the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, the location of the Defendant and the victim at that time, the method of pricing

Although the victim's statement was reversed as to whether the victim was satisfyd with the defendant, as long as the victim's core statement is consistent with the victim's core statement, it is not sufficient to deny the credibility.

On the other hand, in the case of the defendant, the first police did not memory about the victim's head.

After making a statement, the prosecution made two times.

The statement was made at the time of two times in the court, but the statement was reversed as it was just the head of the victim due to the mistake in the process of spreading the beer of the victim.

This is because of the lapse of time, and rather, it is difficult to believe that the statement itself is a clear statement and that the color to conceal the crime is reverse.

company with the company

F. F. M. M.C. Sheet.