1. According to the amendment of the purport of the plaintiff's claim at the trial, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties or may be found in Gap's testimony made by the witness of the court of first instance, taking into account the following facts: Gap's statements (including the number of each branch; hereinafter the same shall apply); Gap's statements (including the number of branch offices; hereinafter the same shall apply); Gap's statements (including the number of branch offices; hereinafter the same shall apply); Gap's statements (including the number of branch offices); and Eul's witness of the court of first instance, the whole purport of the pleadings.

1) The Defendant is the party to the instant building site in Daegu-gu F, L, and M (hereinafter “instant building site”).

3) Ground G building (hereinafter “instant building”)

A) On the other hand, H, as the Defendant’s husband, granted the right of representation from the Defendant and managed the lease, etc. of the building of this case on behalf of the Defendant. 2) The Plaintiff and the Appointor D are both married couples, and the Appointor B and the Appointor E are also married couple.

B. On behalf of the Defendant, H around October 28, 201, a lease agreement is concluded between the Plaintiff and the Selection Party E on behalf of the Defendant to lease the six floors of the instant building that the Defendant had been newly built at KRW 987,00,000 (hereinafter “instant provisional agreement”).

B) Around November 21, 201, 201, H entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “each prior lease agreement”) on behalf of the Defendant that the Defendant would lease the 6th floor of the instant building between the Plaintiff and the Selection under the instant provisional contract (hereinafter “each prior lease agreement”) on behalf of the Defendant, around November 21, 2011.

However, in the case of monthly rent, the value-added tax is separate.

【Contents of the preceding lease agreement Serial Serial 601 at the time of the Plaintiff at Defendant 1, 20,000,000 won from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013, 202 Defendant 2, at the time of Defendant 2, at the time of Defendant 2, appointed parties including the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”). However, at the time of Plaintiff B, 602, 270,000,000 won from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013)

each of them is subject to each prior lease agreement.