The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of KRW 7,000,000) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. There is no change in circumstances that may consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and considering the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable even considering the circumstances alleged by the defendant as the grounds for appeal.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

4. In accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, the decision of the court below shall be corrected ex officio as follows:

Part 6 of the Second Part, “Defendant shall not report to the competent authorities on the part,” which read “Defendant shall not report to the competent authorities on August 2013.” The part of the Second Part, “Defendant shall be an urban area,” which read “Defendant shall be “Defendant shall be an urban area, around August 2013,” and the part of the third part, “each fine shall be elected” of the third part, “(except for the violation of the Building Act following the extension without reporting).”