logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.12.03 2013고정2044
공갈
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a private taxi driver, and the victim C is a person who operates a call taxi company under the trade name of "D".

On October 19, 2012, at the victim's office located in the third floor of Seoul E-building in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, there is a problem in maintaining its members when considering the data of 135 personal taxi members who were admitted to D. This case also recognized the data. If there is a problem related to the illegal request for subsidies from the call taxi company, the representative director of the company is detained due to the fact that other call taxi companies have paid subsidies. The representative director of the company was detained. At the time of the time of the payment, the defendant suggested that the representative director would pay money to KRW 135,000,000,000, representing 135 personal taxi members, communication expenses and 1 year, and the amount of funds negotiated with the company, and the victim was granted from the victim's office on December 5, 2012.

Accordingly, the Defendant received property by threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and G;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording records and investigation reports (or relative investigation into the H head office);

1. Relevant Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion by the Defendant, etc. under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the facts charged in this case are accurately pointed out the facts of the victim company’s corruption in the process of receiving the amount of NAS installments and communications expenses that the individual taxi members should receive from the victim, and that it constitutes a legitimate act even if the intent of domestic crime is recognized.

The crime of conflict.

arrow