1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 18, 2018, at around 05:00, the Plaintiff driven a B-to-pubed car, and passed around 336.15 km away from the west Coastal Expressway.

Plaintiff

C, prior to the vehicle, has operated the operation of a brake to stop a vehicle by reporting that K7 automobiles, which are prior vehicles, were stopped, but it did not reach k7 automobiles and stopped, and the plaintiff also got back parts of the frighting car.

D, which was on board a passenger car, the front car, has suffered approximately two weeks of medical treatment. D, which is on the top of the foregoing accident, has been suffering from the catum catum in need of treatment.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) b.

After confirming the condition of the vehicle that was lowered from the vehicle, the Plaintiff left the phrase “I ambi. I ambi. I ambi. I ambi. I am.” and left the site as is.

C. On May 15, 2018, the Defendant, based on the investigation results on the foregoing accident, suspended a k7-learning passenger car. The Plaintiff concluded that the k7-learning passenger car was pushed ahead of the future and that the k7-learning passenger car was reconciled once again, and that “the Plaintiff did not take necessary measures, such as killing or injuring people or destroying goods due to a traffic accident, and providing relief to victims,” the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on May 15, 2018 of the revocation of the 2-Class ordinary passenger car driver’s license.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff was investigated on the suspicion that he/she committed a violation of Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes by failing to take measures such as aiding and abetting the victim even though he/she suffered from d's crypumumum in need of treatment for about two weeks by negligence in the above occupational negligence, and was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment from the prosecutor of the Suwon branch office inside the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office on May 18, 2018.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsured Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 9, and arguments.