A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 7, 2017, at around 20:20 on April 7, 2017, the Defendant interfering with his/her business: (a) refrain from drinking in the “EE Game Chapter” managed by the Victim D in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, and brued from the victim and other customers; and (b) he/she is demanded by the victim and other customers to make it easy to do so; and (c) he/she must grow up to be fluened by the Defendant in order to make the flue flue fest fla fa flab fab

The victim’s game room business was obstructed by force, such as “Abrupt,” etc., and a part of the customers were unable to take place any longer.

2. On April 7, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and at around 20:50 on April 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) had a disturbance in the said “E Game site”, and (b) had a sound of the customer.

“A person who receives a report and arrives at the site by G in the circumstances belonging to the F District District of the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station, and is asked questions about the circumstances of the case, “Ye,” “Ye,” “Yek flab flab, Ye flab,” etc., “G’s chest flab by hand on the right hand hand hand, and after this, G’s chest and shoulder flab on the hand hand hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of D and H

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. For the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the first-class crime (Interference with Business) [Scope of Recommendation] (Interference with Business] and the second-class crime (Interference with Business Execution) with no basic area (from June to one year) (in June to six months) [the person subject to special sentencing] [the scope of recommended punishment] [the scope of recommendation] interference with the execution of official duties. The mitigated area (in January to eight months) [the person subject to special mitigation] [the person subject to special mitigation].