beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. On November 22, 2013, the Plaintiff, as a company engaged in a gold-type manufacturing business of motor vehicle parts, commenced rehabilitation procedures with the Seoul Central District Court 2013 Mahap206 on July 15, 2014. The above rehabilitation procedures were discontinued on July 15, 2014. The Defendant is a person who manufactures and sells motor vehicle parts with the trade name “E” in Busan Seo-gu D.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, purport of whole pleading
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff asserts that, as the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the raw materials of the automobile parts up to February 13, 2013, the Plaintiff did not receive KRW 21,175,000 out of the price of the goods of KRW 28,637,35,354 on December 31, 2012, and KRW 10,535,366 on December 31, 2013 (hereinafter “the instant goods payment claim”), the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the price of the goods KRW 21,175,00 and delay damages therefrom.
In regard to this, the Defendant’s claim for the price of the instant goods is 10,535,367 won for the price of goods on October 31, 2012 (hereinafter “the price of goods in October”), and 16,321,60 won for the price of goods on November 30 of the same year, and 10,639,633 won for the price of goods in November of the same year.
In other words, the plaintiff is not a corporation, and the plaintiff is not a corporation, and the plaintiff is not a corporation.
(B) The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff’s claim cannot be complied with on the grounds that all of the instant claim for the price of the instant goods was transferred to KRA, and the Defendant fully repaid the price of the instant goods. (b) In full view of the overall purport of the entries and arguments in the Plaintiff’s staff F, the Defendant, and the Defendant, and the Defendant, and the Extraordinary, agreed to promptly pay the price of KRW 10,535,367 for the instant October 10; (c) on February 6, 2013, the Defendant transferred the instant claim for the price of the instant goods to KRA and notified the Defendant thereof; and (d) issued and revoked tax invoices several times; and (d) the Defendant.