logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.07.09 2015고정121
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C On December 13:36, 2014, the Defendant, who is a driver of a beer cruise-type cruise vehicle, was driving under the influence of alcohol, on the grounds that there was considerable reason to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking smells, putting the fluence in a fluence with drinking instruments, and showing a defect response by inserting the fluences while waiting for signal at the Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jin

Therefore, even though the defendant was requested from the Jincheon Police Station D District E on the same day to comply with the sobreath measurement by inserting the breathm for a drinking measuring instrument from around 13:58 to about 30 minutes on the same day, the defendant failed to comply with the sobreath measurement of a police officer without justifiable grounds by avoiding the breathing into the breathr.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Records of the drink of drinking, the register of drink of drinking measuring instruments, and the records of drinking measurements;

1. Application of video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for conviction under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. According to the evidence as to whether the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and the legality of the arrest of a flagrant offender, the police officers of the Jincheon Police Station D District D District D District D District D including F, upon receiving a report from 112, stating that “A vehicle is suspected of drinking alcohol that runs away from a shocking and Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, and that the reported person sent to the said intersection was identified by the Defendant; the Defendant did not respond to the police officer’s demand for presentation of identification card; the Defendant did not respond to the demand of the police officer for presentation of identification card in response to inspection during the signal atmosphere; and the Defendant was unable to walk properly at the time, and it was revealed that during dialogue process.

arrow