Text
1. C on July 3, 2014, the par value of which is KRW 100,000,000, the payee, the defendant, and the date of issuance for the defendant on July 3, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The judgment revoking the preceding fraudulent act was rendered on June 5, 2013, where the Plaintiff sought revocation of the fraudulent act by making the debtor D and beneficiary D as the husband of D and the Seoul Northern District Court 2012Kahap1090, the Seoul Northern District Court 2012Kahap1090, “C and D shall revoke the donation contract concluded on March 21, 2011. C was sentenced to the Plaintiff that “C shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 170,000,000 and the amount at the rate of KRW 5% per annum from the day following the day when this judgment became final to the day when full payment is made.” The Defendant’s appeal was dismissed on May 23, 2014 (Seoul High Court 2013Na38888), and the final appeal by the Defendant was dismissed on July 7, 2014, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on June 11, 2014.
B. On July 3, 2014, C issued promissory notes to the Defendant, who is the child of C, with a face value of KRW 100,000,000,000 at face value, and payment at sight, the payee, the Defendant, the place of issuance, the place of payment, and the place of payment, respectively, (hereinafter “instant promissory notes”) and made a notarial deed thereon.
C. C’s claim for the return of the lease deposit was leased (hereinafter “the lease of this case”) with the lease deposit amount of KRW 170,000,000, and the period from May 14, 2011 to May 13, 2013 during the period of Ansan-si owned on March 21, 201, for the lease deposit amount of KRW 170,000,000, and KRW 906,000.
On July 22, 2014, upon the Defendant’s application on July 22, 2014, there was a seizure and assignment order on the instant lease deposit claim under this Court’s 2014TTT6009, which reached E on August 5, 2014. (2) Upon the Plaintiff’s application on July 25, 2014, there was an attachment and assignment order on the instant lease deposit claim under this Court’s 2014TT6173 on August 7, 2014.
E. The repayment and deposit E of a lessor paid KRW 100,000,000 to the Defendant out of KRW 170,000,000 of the lease deposit of this case (the time of payment is not clear), and the remainder of KRW 70,000.