Text
Imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of No. 1 and No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant, and for the crimes of No. 3 through No. 13 in the judgment of the defendant, two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】 On December 16, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten (10) months by imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on December 16, 2010, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 24, 2010, and the said suspended sentence was revoked on November 14, 201 and is currently being executed.
【Criminal Facts】 The Defendant conspired with C and D to drive a gallon vehicle in collusion with C and D, caused drilling accidents by some of the cabs on board the Defendant, D and the Defendant’s ancillary F., and the Defendant and D agreed to receive insurance money by hospitalizing the victim as the victim.
1. C around 12:51 on January 12, 2010, around 12:51, 2010, a traffic accident occurred where the Defendant, and D, while driving the said gallon vehicle, who was on the gallon of the gallon, took part of the back part of the H taxi vehicle driven by D.
On January 26, 2010, the defendant, C, etc. acquired a total of KRW 6,776,700 from the victim Korean Commercial Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. for the agreed amount and treatment expenses and acquired them by deception.
2. In collusion with C and D, the Defendant: (a) faced with the H taxi vehicle of the victim G (56 years old); (b) destroyed the said vehicle in collusion with C and D in order to cover repair costs of KRW 295,500; and (c) inflicted an injury on the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.
"2015 Highest 2526"
3. On Aug. 1, 2012, the Defendant posted a letter stating “to sell a mobile phone with gallon S3 high-end mobile phone” on an Internet site, such as Google, and, on Aug. 13, 2012, transfers KRW 600,000 to the victim I who reported the above writing to the Defendant and made the contact with the Defendant on Aug. 13, 2012, he/she would send a mobile phone with gal justop
The phrase “the meaning was false.”
However, the defendant did not have a gallon lusium juS3 and did not have an intent or ability to sell a mobile phone even if he received a mobile phone payment from the victim.
Nevertheless, it is not possible.