The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (one year and six months) against the defendant in the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Determination takes into account the following: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided; (b) the amount of running cars is covered by a comprehensive insurance; and (c) the Defendant has no other criminal records other than punished by a fine for each of the crimes of this kind in 192 and 197; (b) however, the crime of this case is committed in violation of the signal, and the degree of negligence is very serious; (c) the occurrence of the death of two and three persons is serious; (d) the occurrence of serious injury; (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. is not reached; and (e) all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, including the records and arguments of this case, shall not be deemed to be heavier.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.