logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.30 2017고정512
폭행치상
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants had a marital relationship between Defendant B and his husband, with Defendant A’s incompact and card use, etc., with which the appraisal is not good.

1. On October 12, 2016, Defendant A, at the Defendant’s house located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu Suwon-gu, Defendant A, made an oral dispute with Defendant A with the victim B due to the unknown and excessive use of the card, late home, etc.

While the victim was aware of credit cards and belongings while the victim was in a dispute, the defendant, who was able to take handbag bag cited by the defendant, used the hand bag in order not to take it back, assaulted the victim by pushing the victim with the basaw of the victim's bath and selling with the arms and legs.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as dump dump, sale, sale, sale, and sale open sale, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On October 12, 2016, Defendant B assaulted the victim, i.e., the shoulder part of the victim by hand and the scambling, in order to take the handbag of the victim A, among the disputes, at the Defendant’s house located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on the said ground.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A voice recorded in a recording file CD;

1. B medical certificate;

1. Results of inquiries about sources of F fixed work;

1. Investigation report (the contents of the cell phone recording file submitted by the suspect A) / [Defendant B]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police suspect interrogation protocol to A;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment against the crime: Articles 262 and 260(1) (Optional to a punishment) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) (Optional to a punishment): Article 260(1) (Optional to a punishment) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A asserts that an act constitutes a legitimate defense or a legitimate act, which was conducted in order to avoid the other party’s assault, as a matter of course, constitutes an act to avoid the other party’s defense or a legitimate act. However, each of the decisions is made.

arrow