1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit include the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

.F. The amount of N.N. The amount of N.N. will be notified;

Suwon도요 도요

H: and A Professor Professor Professor Professor Dol was called Dold by the thickness, and this letter was made only.

I shall transmit crimes and audit.

H: Professor No. 1406, Mar. 9, 2016>

H. The Ministry of Health and Welfare

The contact will be opened to unsatisfy the thickness of the teaching staff by listening to good novels.

Hadrida Hadar

(b) and (Cr.) I have dumped a request for confirmation once with respect to the deposit of a professor A's thickness.

In other words, I would like to communicate once.

H: Around March 11, 2016, 2016, the term “F” means that he/she has been appointed as a professor of son during his/her today’s meeting, and the term “FN” means that he/she has drawed his/her research L, and the term “FNN” means that he/she will contact with FNN at a time when he/she

At the time of meeting, I do not accept the request for deposit.

F: (Omission) Amount of deposit and summary of the liquor tax on the head of passbook.

H:I will audit M Bank (Account Number Statement), A 1.470,000 won [7,300,000 won (excluding gold) to 7.30,00 won (73,000 won) and 1.470,000 won].

(3) The Plaintiff merely instructed the Plaintiff to process as a process, and the Plaintiff’s testimony at his own discretion, which came to know that the accounting system was closed and could not be returned to the Intervenor’s account, demanded H to return personnel expenses by informing the Plaintiff’s personal account number and requesting the return of personnel expenses. The Plaintiff is not believed in the following respect: (a) Nos. 9, 20 (including each number, G’s factual confirmation), witness G, and H’s testimony, consistent with the Plaintiff’s assertion that “The Plaintiff had never known such content at all.”

① As of January 22, 2016, G submitted the F’s resignation date (20 days) the F’s resignation date was written as January 22, 2016, and the F’s retirement date was treated as January 31, 2016, and the Intervenor did not have any grounds for refund of F’s labor cost.

The above act was committed in order to return the personnel expenses paid in excess to the account of the educational research institute.