1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On June 9, 2014, the Plaintiff was employed as a nurse at the B Medical Center (hereinafter referred to as the “B Medical Center”) and served as the nurse.

On February 19, 2016, the B Medical Center rendered a reduction of one-month disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff was aware that the result of the spactony test was trained on January 27, 2016, and that it reported it to the head of the supply office who is a senior C, thereby delaying surgery and impairing the honor and dignity of the B Medical Center, and that it was detrimental to the honor and dignity of the B Medical Center.

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”). On February 29, 2016, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disciplinary action, filed an application for review with B Medical Center on February 29, 2016, but the B Medical Center held a Review Committee on March 11, 2016 and decided to reduce the same salary as the instant disciplinary action.

On February 26, 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant disciplinary action was unfair, and filed an application for remedy with the Chungcheong Regional Labor Relations Commission. On June 9, 2016, the Chungcheong Regional Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for remedy, deeming that the instant disciplinary action was justifiable and dismissed on June 9, 2016.

(J) On July 12, 2016, the National Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for reexamination on the same ground as the first inquiry court on October 7, 2016.

(C) The Plaintiff’s disciplinary action as to the instant decision on reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of this case is unlawful for the following reasons. The instant decision on reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of reexamination of this case is unlawful: (a) there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition; (b) evidence Nos. 1, 2, and evidence Nos. 1 through 12; and (c) the purport of the entire pleadings of the instant decision on reexamination

Since the results of the s team disinfection test are confirmed and recorded by the head of the supply office C, it is unreasonable for B medical personnel to take the instant disciplinary action for the reason of violating the Plaintiff’s above duties.

The operation is delayed because it does not confirm the result of the equal productive testing.