The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court against the accused (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below takes into account the following factors: (a) the defendant's mistake is divided; (b) the defendant's driver's vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance; (c) the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime; and (d) the crime of this case was committed during the suspension period; (c) the defendant committed the crime of this case by neglecting the police vehicle's stopping instruction by the police officer for the crackdown on drinking driving; (d) the blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case was 0.228%; (e) the victim's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. were committed; and (e) the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case were considered to be excessive.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is apparent that the decision of the court below was omitted from the selection of a punishment of 1. and each imprisonment is omitted, it shall be corrected to add it ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure after the third page of the decision of the court below