logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.12.11 2015나6164
기타(금전)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

In the first instance court, the plaintiff filed a claim for rent and return of unjust enrichment based on a lease agreement against the defendant, and the first instance court partly accepted each of the above claims.

However, since only the defendant appealed against the part of the judgment against him, the part against the plaintiff in the judgment of the court of first instance was excluded.

The court's explanation of this case is as follows: (a) by adding "No. 14-1 of the evidence No. 14-1 submitted by the defendant to the court of first instance" to Section 21 of the judgment of first instance; and (b) except for adding "No. 5" to Section 6 of the judgment of first instance, it is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of first instance, and thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow