logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.18 2015나21544
임대보증금 및 임대료
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the designated parties E,F, andG and the defendant 1,153.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Construction of L Building 1) L Building 1 (hereinafter “1 Dong”) on the H and one parcel outside of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and J 2 (hereinafter “2 Dong”) on the 1st and two lots of land (hereinafter “1”) and “the instant building” in cases where 1 and 2 Dong are collectively referred to.

(2) Each underground level is a commercial building with a size of 5th and 10th above ground level. 2) The development of the Han River Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Shan River Industry Development”) is one executor, two executors in the case of the Cineas Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Cineas”), and the Cineas Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Cineas”) is the construction of the instant building. The instant building was completed on February 28, 2006.

B. The part of the instant building from the first to the fifth above ground among the instant buildings (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).

A) The sales or registration was made by dividing a total of 1,884 stores. On June 19, 2006, the K non-Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K non-Real Estate Trust”) via a trust process by the executive officers.

2) After the registration of ownership transfer was completed, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of individual buyers for the stores where the sale price was fully paid, and the 348 stores where the sale price was not completed on March 12, 2007, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the KF real estate trust for the stores where the sale price was not fully paid, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the KF real estate trust.

3) The instant shopping mall is expected to be used as an integrated shopping mall from the beginning of the sale, and the parties concerned are the ratio of the sales price to the sales price for each individual store out of KRW 191,478,567,591 of the total sales price of the instant shopping mall (hereinafter “distribution ratio”).

4) The share ratio of the store and the share of the Plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs, etc.”) to the following table:

arrow