logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.08.09 2017고단952
절도
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 1, 2016, the Defendant is a worker who was not detained in prison due to larceny at the Busan District Court Branch of the Dong Branch of the Busan District Court and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million on January 12, 2017, and is currently pending in the appellate trial.

1. On May 18, 2016, the Defendant discovered that a bank containing new shoes and personal belongings, etc. is stored in a sponsor vehicle at the site of a victim D (Woo, 62 years of age) at the construction site of a building in Suwon-gu Busan, Busan, and found that the bank was stored in a sponsor vehicle in a sponsor vehicle with a sponsor, and then stolen the gap in surveillance, and then cut off the market price of the female’s ownership at an unsponed price.

2. On May 18, 2016, at around 10:50 on May 18, 2016, at the construction site of the building in Suwon-gu, Busan, and at around 58 years old, the Defendant discovered the gap in which belongings was stored in the construction site to be put in a yellow scam, and then cut off one cellular phone, one Busan Bank Card, one transportation card, one transportation card, and two Ocheon Won-do Won-si.

3. On June 1, 2016, at around 12:00, the Defendant discovered that a bank containing belongings was placed in a cargo vehicle at the site of a construction project located in Suwon-gu G of Busan, and discovered the gap in which surveillance was neglected, the Defendant stolen one cell phone with the victim’s market value of at least 100,000 won, one driver’s license, one copy of the head of the Nonghyup-gu, one copy of the head of the Nong-gu, one of the head of the Tong-do, one of the head of the Si’s non-explosion, and one of the non-marketed rooms at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made with D;

1. Application of the F and H respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment and punishment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution (the maximum amount of theft is not the maximum amount, there is no previous conviction who is sentenced to suspended execution or heavier punishment, and the defendant acknowledges his mistake.

arrow