logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.11.28 2012고단8784
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 9, 2012, the Defendant stated that “E” at the store selling the victim D’s box located in Busan-gu Busan-gu Busan-gu Busan-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-type Seoul-type Seoul-type (hereinafter “E”), “The Defendant would buy an apartment of 32 square meters by means of multiplying 25 million won by the amount of money if 25 million won is paid.”

However, in fact, the defendant was liable for a large amount of debt to others at the time, and even if he received the above money, he did not pay it.

In any way, there was no intention or ability to live an apartment.

The Defendant received KRW 25 million from the victim to September 20, 2012, including the Defendant received KRW 5 million in cash from the victim at the seat, as the purchase price for the apartment.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G, stating that “I would pay the borrowed amount including interest at a rate of 20 percent from seven days to twenty percent on the borrowed amount if I borrowed money.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money including interest, even if the principal was not repaid and the interest was returned to many people. However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money from the victim even though the money was borrowed from the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received a total of KRW 1,450,00 from the victim twice around October 201.

3. Around December 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G at the place specified in paragraph 2, stating that “If a KRW 1 million is additionally lent to the victim G, it shall be repaid including, before borrowing KRW 1 million and interest.”

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the money, including interest, even if the money was borrowed from the victim for the same reason as the statement in Paragraph 2.

Ultimately, the defendant deceivings the victim as such, and is against the victim.

arrow