1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff sold the land for fishermen's livelihood measures to the defendant for KRW 400 million, and even if not, the plaintiff agreed to maintain the above contract without cancelling it and to increase the purchase price to KRW 400 million, but only KRW 290 million among them was paid by the defendant. Thus, the defendant asserts that he is obliged to pay the remaining price to the plaintiff KRW 110 million.

The Plaintiff sold the land for fishermen’s livelihood countermeasures to the Defendant for KRW 400 million only on the basis of the statement in Gap evidence No. 3

It is not sufficient to acknowledge that the contract was made to increase the purchase price in KRW 400 million, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

(A) Comprehensively taking account of the descriptions in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1-2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1-2 and Eul evidence Nos. 1-2 and the purport of the whole pleadings in the testimony of witness C, the plaintiff sold to the defendant on May 29, 2004 the land for fishermen’s livelihood countermeasures related to D development projects in the amount of KRW 230 million. On the date of the contract, the plaintiff received the down payment of KRW 20 million on June 14, 2004, and the sum of KRW 230 million on June 14, 2004. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s claim for the remaining purchase price of this case premised on this is without merit, and is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.