The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. Around 10:00 on May 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) purchased goods equivalent to KRW 41,350,00, such as coffee; (b) purchased goods from Kim Jong-si, and calculated the price of goods by presenting the back of which a forged 50,000,000, which was obtained by a non-commercial method, has not been printed on the non-commercial date; and (c) presented the back to the employees.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired forged currency and exercised it with the knowledge of the fact.

2. A counterfeited currency which is the object of the crime of uttering of the designation of a counterfeited currency shall be sufficient if, from an objective point of view, it leads to the degree that an ordinary person misleads it into a true currency, and the degree of the said Article shall be sick in the truth.

Although there is no need to identify the truth easily, any person shall have the appearance of the general public so that it may be mistaken for a true currency in the distribution process.

(2) In light of the following circumstances established by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Do7704, Mar. 29, 2012). 201, the following circumstances, i.e., (i) the paper of this case has copied the Bank of Korea 50,00 won into an electronic reproduction machine; and (ii) the size, shape, and color of the paper is similar (a) although the paper of this case has a size, shape, and color of the paper is similar (the length of the paper is smaller than 2m, the length is smaller than 10,000 won; hereinafter the same shall apply); (iii) the paper is in blank and the back is left blank; and (iv) the employee of Dus was unaware of the fact that the paper of this case was not genuine 50,000 won at the time of the Defendant’s establishment of the paper of this case; (v) the Defendant’s use of the forged bill is a fine not exceeding two million won or less than two million won.