1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff as the insured for BD vehicles owned by A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into the automobile insurance contract with the D body-ray vehicles owned by C (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. At around 16:00 on November 16, 2014, A driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and straighted the Plaintiff’s road crossing in front of the F convenience point in the city E, as indicated in the attached Form No. 1, the victim’s gate, who was in the right edge of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, was shocked into the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s right edge, as well as the victim’s gate, who was in the right edge of the said private road crossing.

다. 피해자와 피해자가 타고 있던 오토바이는 위와 같은 충격으로 본래의 진행 방향 오른쪽 앞 대각선 방향으로 튕겨져 나가면서 현장 약도 기재와 같이 사거리 부근에 주차되어 있던 피고 차량 뒤 범퍼 및 트렁크 부분과 충돌하게 되었다. 라.

In the above accident, the victim suffered injuries, such as rain kids, damage to kids, cage cages, etc. which are open to the river, and cage cages, etc., and the plaintiff paid 82,185,280 won to the victim with medical expenses and agreed money according to insurance contracts.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 to 11, 13, and 14 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The instant accident caused the occurrence of an accident where the driver of the Plaintiff and the victim caused the accident, or the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle illegally parked the Defendant’s vehicle on a road with frequent vehicle moving.

나. 또한 피해자는 원고 차량과의 1차 충격 시에는 원고 차량과 신체 접촉이 없는 상태에서 진행 방향 오른쪽으로 튕겨져 나가면서 불법 주차된 피고 차량에 2차 충격을 당하게 되었고, 피해자가 입은 상해의 부위 및...