A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dominated Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) on October 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven the E- taxi driven by the victim D (age 47) driving from the front line of the said E-cab driven by the victim D (age 47) who was going to the opposite lane on the front line of the said passenger vehicle, and turned to the front line; (b) there was a duty of care to turn to the left; (c) there was a place where the median line was installed and the left is prohibited; and (d) there was a duty of care to turn to the left; and (d) there was a duty of care to turn to the left; and (d) the victim D (age 47) who was going to the opposite lane on the front line of the said passenger vehicle.

The Defendant, due to these occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim D, such as diversous salt, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim F (the 46-year-old passenger), suffered from the injury of emulshion dive salt, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim G (the 47-year-old passenger), and escaped without taking necessary measures such as immediately stopping the taxi to ensure that the 726,216 won of the repair cost is 72,00 won.

2. 도로교통법위반(음주측정거부) 피고인은 2013. 10. 9. 01:48경 대전중부경찰서 H지구대에서 위 교통사고에 대해 조사를 받던 중 경비교통과 교통조사계 경위 I으로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 발음이 부정확하며 비틀거리는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 4회에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았으나, 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 이유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지...