logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.12 2017가합522575
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 5, 1994, the Plaintiff changed its trade name into “E” through “Social Welfare Foundation D,” and the status of the parties and persons concerned.

"C" regardless of whether it is before or after the change in each trade name;

(2) The defendant is an incorporated association established on July 22, 1995 for the purpose of realizing the ideology of the J's anti-com and developing G by saving the fundamental doctrine of the F of Ttin and enhancing the I of H, a subordinate of G, and enhancing the development of G.

Article 11 (2) of the defendant's articles of incorporation provides that "the chief director shall be the president of the General Affairs Office, and the vice chief director shall be the ex officio president of the Administration."

3) G is one of the religious groups in the Republic of Korea, and is established and operated as a foundation, an incorporated association, a social welfare foundation, and an educational foundation for educational purposes, which are the highest administrative agency that succeeds to the race and has the highest authority and position of the religious group as well as the highest authority and status of religious affairs and dignity. A general secretary, who is the legislative organ, the central office, the judicial organ, and the central office staff of the judiciary, and other specialized administrative agencies. A general secretary, who is the chief secretary, shall represent the religious group, preside over the general affairs administration, and the general secretary, shall deliberate and decide on major religious affairs. G may establish and operate a religious affairs association, the incorporated association, the social welfare foundation, and the educational foundation for educational purposes. (b) The Plaintiff concluding the instant agreement on November 30, 2004, who is the chief director of the General Affairs Office of G and the defendant, the president of K (hereinafter “LL,” hereinafter referred to as “M”).

2) As between the parties, the following arrangements (hereinafter referred to as the “instant agreement”) shall be entered into:

(C) The following matters (each article shall be agreed upon) with the President M of the General Affairs Director G as "A," and C representative director A as "B," respectively:

Article 1:In order to promote the social welfare work of the Order, the Director General of the G General Management Institute promises C to implement the purpose of establishment and to operate in a sound manner.

arrow