Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (one year of imprisonment, one year of confiscation) is too unfasible and that the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of the offense; (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim that the victim actively wanted the Defendant’s wife is a favorable sentencing ground; and (c) the nature of the offense is not good by repeatedly exercising violence against the victim who had a relationship with the victim; and (d) the fact that the crime of violence was committed four times is a disadvantageous sentencing ground.

In full view of the above sentencing factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the commission of the crime, and all other matters on the sentencing indicated in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence of the lower judgment is deemed reasonable, and the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.