The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and misunderstandings, a significant portion of the amount of damage was repaid, and the victim expressed his/her intent not to be punished against the defendant.

However, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being able to commit the crime even though he was committed during the period of repeated crime, and the amount obtained by fraud is also high.

In addition, the court below seems to have sentenced punishment by fully considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the court below because new sentencing data have not been submitted in the trial.

In full view of other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.