Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Employment period between July 7, 2005 and July 6, 2006
B From July 7, 2006 to July 6, 2007, at the site of full-time responsible supervision services for river repair works.
B From July 7, 2007 to July 6, 2008, at the site of full responsible supervision services for river repair works.
B The river supervision site 4 July 7, 2008 to July 6, 2009.
B The full-time responsible supervision services for the river repair project shall be from July 7, 2009 to July 6, 2010.
B The full-time responsible supervision services for river repair works are 6 from July 7, 2010 to July 6, 2011.
B The full-time responsible supervision services for river repair works shall be from July 7, 201 to July 6, 2012.
B From July 7, 2012 to December 31, 2012, from July 7, 2012, the full responsible supervision services for the repair works of the river at the end of the site C at the end of the site, from October 31 to December 31, 2012.
C The full responsible supervision services for the flood disaster restoration project 10 January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2013.
C. From April 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013, the full responsible supervision services for the flood disaster restoration project.
D Team 12 From July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013
D Team 13 From October 2014 to October 19, 2015.
D Team (E Site)
A. The Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant by setting the term of the employment contract as follows.
However, the following contract term commonly depends on the proviso that "if the pertinent business is terminated prior to the termination date of the contract or is suspended for not less than one month and the plaintiff is unable to work for not less than one month, the contract shall be terminated."
B. On the other hand, the defendant ordered the service as follows, and the plaintiff worked for the following period at the service site awarded by the defendant.
The service period of the Plaintiff’s order to provide labor is 10 years from January 3, 2005 to October 3, 2011, 201, from January 3, 2005 to September 3, 201, 201, the Gyeonggi-do supervision over the full-time responsible supervision over the Plaintiff’s order to provide labor.