logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.26 2016나2061861
횡령금 반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the deletion of the “Embezzlement 11” of the second instance as “a agreed deposit,” and the first to the third first to the same third to the same end, and thus, it is identical to the statement in the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow