Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-Wood vehicle.

On July 1, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car at around 12:06, while driving the said car, led to the intersection of the shooting distance in front of Gwangju Mine District C along the two-lanes from the erode of the mine area to the parallel parallel basin.

Since there was an intersection installed in a signal, there was a duty of care for a person engaged in driving service to live well on the right and the right and the right, to observe the signal, and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the collision between the front part of the victim D(20 years of age) drive E-Ma-May Road and the right side part of the Defendant's driver's Gaypted Vehicle, which was conducted in accordance with the new code from the right side of the Defendant's running direction to the left side by negligence directly leading to the red signal in violation of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury of 12 weeks to the victim D, on the part of the 12-day Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slives, the injury of the victim F (the 45-year-old passenger) who is the passenger of the Defendant’s driver’s Haddives vehicle, for approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the injury of the victim G (the 46-year-old passenger) who is the passenger of the Defendant’s driver’s Hadives vehicle, such as the 1 wlive wlives of the wn

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written statement in F and G preparation;

1. The actual condition of each traffic accident;

1. Investigation and verification (CCTV image analysis, etc.);

1. H signal system map;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis (Nos. 18,20,23 of the evidence list);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The criminal records of the defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and the crime of this case.