logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.02.05 2014고정938
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is CCA110 10 c l00 c) driving service.

On June 9, 2014, at around 12:50, the Defendant driven the above Oba, and proceeded around about 10 km from the IC room to the Cheongnam-gun of the E farm in the front of the E farm located in the Cheongbuk-gun of the Chungcheongbuk-gun to the Cheongnam-gun of the city. The Defendant is a place where a yellow solid line is installed and the Uban is prohibited.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate steering devices, brakes, and other devices, and to prevent accidents in advance by safely reporting traffic conditions in front and rear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and tried to make a wide-distance to the right side of the road, and followed by the same direction, thereby obstructing the course of the victim F (the age of 81) driving GCA110 Oba, thereby obstructing the Defendant’s operation of the above Obaba and the part of the Hand on the left side and the part of the victim’s Hand on the right side.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim F, such as cerebral cerebral cerebrovassis, which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment from the victim H (70 years of age, women) who was on board the victim FF driver's above urba, for approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment.

Judgment

The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 3(2) of the same Act. According to each agreement in the victim F and H preparation, the victims can be acknowledged as the facts that they have withdrawn all their wish to punish the defendant on December 30, 2014, which is after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow