logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.12.14 2018고단271
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 14, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of road traffic law (driving), etc. in the support of the Daejeon District Court on April 14, 2009. On December 19, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a crime of violation of road traffic law (driving) in the support of the Daejeon District Court on the Incheon District Court.

On January 4, 2018, the Defendant driven a car with a alcohol level of about 6 meters from around 00:22 to around 00:22, the Defendant driven a car with a alcohol level of about 0.139% in the blood alcohol level from around 0.139% from the 6m section of the YY-gu, Seo-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City to the outside of the building via the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous conviction in judgment: Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes of one copy of the judgment, such as a written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history (A), report on investigation (verification of the same type of force), and

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of quantity include: (a) the background leading to the instant crime for sentencing; (b) the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration in the Defendant’s blood; and (c) the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant was punished several traffic-related crimes including the Defendant who was punished for driving alcohol three times; and (b) the sentence is determined as ordered by taking account of the various circumstances shown in the instant argument, including the fact that the Defendant was punished for driving alcohol.

arrow