A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 23, 2016, at around 20:20 on December 23, 2016, the Defendant assaulted “D” in the trade name of “D’s operation” in Yangsan City B, by receiving a report of 112 to avoid disturbance without any drinking value, and demanding the Defendant to return home from F, a police officer affiliated with the police box of Yangsansan Police Station, who was called for a police officer to whom the police officer belongs, to whom he was requested to return home, by hand, at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of handling reported cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 of the same Act against police officers) (Article 62 (1) of the same Act provides that a person shall be granted due care to prevent recidivism, in consideration of the circumstances, such as the fact that the person has no record of at least the same kind of suspended execution, the circumstances

1. Although the Defendant asserts to the effect that he was in a state of mental and physical weakness at the time of committing the instant crime, he/she does not accept such assertion in light of the various circumstances shown in the records and arguments.