logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.02.04 2015고정1144
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as a main restaurant in the general restaurant in the area of "E" in Sungnam-si, the Sinnam-si, the Sinnam-si, and the Donnam-si.

No one shall sell drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, on July 10, 2015, the Defendant sold the total amount of KRW 224,500,000, including two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of one week of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of three years of more than

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of F, G, and H;

1. On-site photographs [The defendant alleged that the juvenile of this case was drinking together with other adult customers who had already been drinking alcoholic beverages on the ground of Defendant’s main points, but it is difficult to accept it without any grounds. Rather, according to the evidence of the judgment, the juvenile of this case did not enter another main points for drinking alcohol, but did not enter the main points of this case due to identification examination, and he did not undergo identification examination, again, entered the main points of this case, and ordered the defendant, etc. to do drinking, and the defendant et al. directly issued an order. The juvenile of this case did not appear before the main points of this case, and did not appear together with other customers within the main points of this case, and the defendant did not directly receive an alcoholic beverage value of 224,50 won from the F, which is the juvenile of this case, and the credibility of his testimony is recognized as being proved by his direct statement of G, because he did not directly state his own experience (the testimony of this case).

Application of Statutes

1. Article 59 of the relevant Act and Articles 59 subparagraph 6 and 28 (1) of the Juvenile Protection Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow