A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 17, 2017, the Defendant 20:52 around 20:52, the 1st floor of the building B in Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, B, in front of the “C” of the “C” of the “C” of the building.

“The police officers have the honor to report 112,” from E to the police officers belonging to the Diplomatic Team of the Military Military Police Station of the Republic of Korea who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report.

Anywhere Efavoire도요

Miscellaneous도요도요

“I have heard the horses, I have assaulted the right face of E one time with the upper left hand of the said patrolman, and the arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. On July 17, 2017, around 21:40, the Defendant expressed that, within the military police station of the Mapo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Mapo-si, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender due to the crime described in paragraph 1; and (b) expressed that, in G belonging to the said district forces, the Defendant expressed that, “the police bucks, bucks, bucks, bucks, bucks, hicks, hicks, hicks, hicks, hicks, hicks, hicks, the Defendant bucked the Defendant to the right side of the Hapo-si in order to speak.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the arrest and investigation of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, G, and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic data of assault;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [the scope of punishment recommended according to sentencing guidelines] - Interference with the performance of each official duties - interference with the performance of official duties - Basic area of Category 1 (Interference with the performance of official duties and the coercion of duties) (from June to January 1) (the scope of final sentence due to the aggravation of special sentencing: From June to February 3: June 6 to February - favorable circumstances: The defendant's mistake is recognized.