1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Mayor of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 22, 2007, the Mayor of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”) is the Seoul Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 3,424 square meters (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”).

A) The Defendant designated and publicly announced the instant rearrangement zone as a housing redevelopment project zone, and the housing redevelopment project (hereinafter “instant project”).

(2) On April 19, 2008, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s husband-E own 1/2 square meters of the Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF and its ground buildings located within the instant rearrangement zone, and each of them is the members who filed an application for parcelling-out with the Defendant around February 19, 2008.

B. On November 24, 2011, the head of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the above management and disposal plan to G publicly announced on November 24, 201.

C. Meanwhile, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the price as KRW 328,376,350 on the basis of the date of the public announcement of authorization for the implementation of the project of the Fluxon of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the 1/2 share of each of the above-ground buildings ( January 14, 2008).

On September 21, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant claiming payment of KRW 51,00,00 with Seoul Eastern District Court 2012Da54127, which was the Seoul Eastern District Court’s 51,00,00 and damages for delay thereof, claiming that “the Plaintiff received a large amount of expenses in order to enhance the utility of the building, and the part received by the Defendant in assessing its value is deemed to have been evaluated,” but amended the purport of the claim as stated in the purport of the instant claim on March 14, 2013. The instant case was transferred to this court according to the Seoul Central District Court’s decision of transfer on March 20, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including Ga number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Eul evidence 2 to 6 respectively.