The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Regarding misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, the Defendant provided the victim company with the instant forest as a site for the camping project, and around July 5, 2016, when there was no intent or ability to conduct the camping doping project in the form of a contract for the camping doping project, entices the victim company to build the foundation for creating the camping doping, thereby inducing the victim company to build the foundation for the camping doping, thereby obtaining property benefits of KRW 17,780,260, which is equivalent to the cost of the project. On July 6, 2016, the Defendant received six Karabs in the instant case from the victim company on the ground of the said deception, and the Defendant expressed 20 Karabstes purchase intention at the 20 Kabstes purchase and sale of the instant forest as part of the instant 20 Kabsteg project, and the Defendant had been aware of the price of the instant 26 Kabstegs purchase and sale at the 260 Kabsteg.

In light of the background and purpose that the victim company delivered six parts of the instant car group, it is reasonable to view that six parts of the instant car group had already been able to freely dispose of the defendant due to the victim company’s act of disposal at the time of storage in the instant forest.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Determination: