logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.03.16 2016가단100263
사해행위취소
Text

1. As to C Shares (1/3) in the real estate listed in the separate sheet:

A. As of June 27, 2014 between Defendant A and C.

Reasons

1. The indication limited partnership company of the claim uses the credit card in filing an application for credit card admission with the National Bank of Korea, and borrows the money by concluding a loan transaction agreement, the interest rate set by the National Bank shall be the interest rate set by the National Bank. If the performance of the obligation is delayed, or part of the agreement is violated, it shall lose the benefit of the time, thereby immediately repaying the interest with the damages for delay and the principal and interest, and C shall be jointly and severally guaranteed by the Specialized Partnership.

However, the comprehensive construction of limited partnership companies has lost the benefit of time due to the lack of payment date, and this arrangement has been terminated at the same time.

On November 4, 2004, the National Bank of Korea, a limited partnership company, transferred the above claims to Solomon Savings Bank on November 4, 2004. The Solomon Savings Bank, a stock company, transferred the above claims to the Plaintiff on April 26, 201, and the fact of the transfer was notified as content certification to the Ralomon Comprehensive Construction by a limited partnership company.

December 24, 2015, as of December 24, 2015, as follows:

The Plaintiff, on June 27, 2014, filed an ownership transfer registration with the Cheongju District Court No. 138393, Oct. 17, 2014, on the ground that the agreement on the division of inherited property was received on Oct. 13, 2014, on Oct. 13, 2014, the Cheongju District Court received an ownership transfer registration with the Defendant A on Oct. 13, 2014, for the reason that the agreement on the division of inherited property was completed on Oct. 13, 2014 by the Cheongju District Court No. 138394, Oct. 17, 2014.

C had the obligation to the Plaintiff at the time of the consultation on the division of the inherited property, had the obligation to the other company, had not been subject to any property, but had not been subject to any other property. As a result, the joint collateral for the general creditor was reduced as a result of the said consultation on division.

As such, the agreement on division of inherited property between C and the defendant has been reached.

arrow