(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.09.13 2015가단105483

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.09.13 2015가단105483

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The defendant shall sell and purchase on October 4, 2004 with respect to the share of 145/826 out of 826§³ in Namyang-si, Namyang-si.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 11, 2003, in order to newly construct a church (hereinafter “instant church”) from D, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the purchase price of KRW 260,000,000 among part of 296 square meters in E-Sapa land, F 307 square meters in size, and C farm site of KRW 826 square meters in size (hereinafter “instant land”) and the above above ground storage (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate subject to the instant contract”), and the purchase price of KRW 145 square meters in size (hereinafter “each of the instant land”), and the contract for the registration of the instant land in installments thereafter (hereinafter “instant contract”).

B. On June 30, 2003, D completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each real estate subject to the instant contract No. 1 with the exception of the key land portion.

C. On October 4, 2004, the Plaintiff prepared a sales contract with the Defendant stating that “The share in the instant land is the Plaintiff’s share and the Defendant’s use of the land at will is the 145 square meters as of the indication of the attached drawing” as to the portion of the instant land shall be KRW 30,000,000, and the special agreement shall be accompanied by the attached drawing.”

However, KRW 30,00,000 was agreed to substitute for part of the purchase price paid to D (hereinafter “instant contract”). D.

D On October 29, 2004, on the ground of sale and purchase on September 4, 2004, D completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of this case.

E. As to the key land portion of this case, the Plaintiff continued to use it exclusively and independently after the contract of this case.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 6, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. 1) The 1 and 2 contracts of this case are purchased by specifying the key land portion, but the registration of ownership transfer is made by equity.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2015.01.08 2013나12115

-서울남부지방법원 2017.03.31 2016가단23049

-제주지방법원 2017.09.27 2016나7029

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.24 2014가합533918

-서울동부지방법원 2015.11.03 2014가합107206