The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The lower court determined the sentencing guidelines by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s full recognition of and misjudgments against the mistake; (b) the victims do not want the Defendant’s punishment; and (c) the Defendant repeatedly acquired a vehicle or money against a large number of victims; and (d) the number of victims and the amount of defraudation, etc., which are not less complicated in light of the case in light of the number of victims and the amount of fraud; (b) the Defendant was released from a criminal sentence for the same crime; (c) the Defendant was committing a repeated crime for a period of two months; (d) the injury was not recovered; (e) the injury was not recovered; and (e) the victims did not agree with some victims; and (e) other factors of sentencing specified in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.; and (e) the sentencing guidelines was determined within the scope of recommended punishment (one year to September 9).

In light of the fact that the court below had already taken into account the facts that the defendant had already agreed with the victim N but did not recover the amount of fraud, the number of victims, and the remaining victims' damages, the above circumstance alone changed the sentencing conditions.

It is difficult to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the court below's punishment is determined reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.