The judgment of the first instance court is modified as follows.

A. As to the compulsory auction cases of B real estate B by the District Court

1. The reasoning for this part of this Court is as follows, with the exception of the entry or addition of these basic facts, the entry is as follows from the 13th to 10 second to the 15th to the 10th to the 13th to the 15th to the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, this Court shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main text of

"A trustee A" in Section 27 of the 4th decision of the first instance court shall be stated "A" by the trustee "the defendant".

The "trustee" in Section 4 of the fifth letter of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to "the trustee", and the statement shall be entered into by "the trustee".

Attached Form 23 in attached Table 23 of the 7th judgment of the first instance court shall be stated in attached Form 3.

Attached Form 23 of the Special Agreement in 4,8,10, and 24 in the 7th letter of the judgment of the first instance court shall be stated in attached Form 3.

"H bank and I bank" in Section 2 from the 7th ruling of the first instance court shall be stated "H bank and I bank" in Section 3, "H and I corporation I".

The phrase "the Nos. 10 and 8 of the first instance judgment" shall be read as "the No. 1000 of the dividend goods number".

The 12th 12th 12th of the judgment of the first instance was required to distribute.

“The following shall be added:

In the auction procedure of this case, the Plaintiff, a successor to whom the Seoul Central District Court 2012 against L, issued a letter of execution of succession to the final and conclusive judgment No. 16570, demanded dividends of KRW 37,414,215,135 in total of KRW 27,414,215,135 in total, and interest thereon.

"4,495,653,000 won" in 13th nine of the decision of the first instance court shall be stated "4,395,653,00 won".

The letter "1,605264,072 Won" in the letter "1,605,072 Won 1,605,264,072" in the letter of 15th to 7th of the judgment of the first instance.

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the sum of KRW 28,325,50,076, including boiler inspection expenses, customs expenses, regular inspection expenses for facilities, and floor dredging expenses, out of the facility management expenses and facility management expenses, which are the part relating to the building up to the period prior to the date of permission of a successful bid among the money distributed by the Defendant to the Defendant, constitutes the necessary expenses.