A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the Jeonju District Court's military mountain support, and on April 22, 2012, the execution of the sentence was terminated.

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from January 10, 2013 to around the 13th day of the same month, administered the Metropopic volume of psychotropic drugs at the Defendant’s house No. 106, 1313, the Metropopic Mesophopic (hereinafter referred to as the “Mesophopic Mesophopic”).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Requests for each appraisal, investigation reports (the monetary content of the persons concerned of the National Science Investigation Institute), investigation reports (the monetary content of police officers of the Kim Jong-gu Police Station for symptoms of a suspect);

1. Investigation report (report on confirmation of the market price of narcotics);

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records and other inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of the date of final release of a suspect and reporting accompanying judgments);

1. Article 60 (1) 2 and Article 4 (1) 1 of the Act on the elective Management of Narcotics, Etc. for Crimes;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The Defendant alleged to the effect that the Defendant had not administered a phiphone as stated in the facts charged, although the Defendant alleged to the effect that there was no fact that the phiphone was administered. However, the Defendant’s two-time appraisal of the Defendant’s hair showed the reaction to train phiphones, the Defendant changed to the purport that he was taking the philophones infection at the time, but it is difficult for the Defendant to take the philophones training reaction with the drug as alleged by the Defendant, and the Defendant appeared to have done abnormal behavior like shown in the state of crypism at the time of the instant case, in light of the fact that the Defendant appears to have taken the phiphones as stated in the facts charged, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable

Although the defendant has no record of punishment in relation to the administration of philophones, the defendant denies the crime.