(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.06.08 2015고정1109

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.06.08 2015고정1109

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 16, 2014, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) found the pet dog of the victim B (the son, the 33 years old) in the vicinity of the apartment house in the Busan High-gu Do, Busan High-gu, Busan High-do; and (b) prevented the victim from taking advantage of the part of the victim, such as the victim of the following protruding-do; (c) put the victim’s head car; and (d) laid down the victim’s head car; and (d) laid down the victim’s neck back to the end; (e) put the victim’s head car; and (e) put the victim’s neck and tension on the bones of the bones, which requires approximately 2 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B, C, and D;

1. Certificates of each fact in the preparation of E, F, G, and H;

1. The Defendant asserts that “the victim was fluored with his head, such as the victim, in order to stop his/her operation without representing the pet dog and to stop this operation,” the Defendant stated that “the victim was fluored with his/her head, such as the victim, etc., and did not inflict any injury upon him/her as stated in the facts charged,” and that “B is acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court,” and “B is seeking to find a place where “the victim was fluord with the victim’s head, who was fluored with him/her,” and the Defendant stated to the effect that “the victim was fluord with his/her head, who was fluored with him/her,” and that “the victim was fluord with his/her head,” the content and attitude of his/her statement are natural, and “after fluord with the Defendant.”

E. E. E. M. M. T.T.

In light of the content of the statement to the effect that “the victim mentioned” was “the victim’s statement appears to be consistent,” ② the content of the victim’s diagnosis also conforms to the victim’s statement, ③ the witness immediately after the instant case appears to be neutral, and the statement of the police officer in mobilization was also made by the victim.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2016.10.07 2016노1911

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.05.09 2015고정343

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.24 2014고정463

-수원지방법원 2018.09.05 2018고단2863

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.09.19 2017고단2373