logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.13 2015고단4911
모욕등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On May 19, 2015, the Defendant, around 22:25, 2015, told the victim D (the age of 49) who was in the police patrol, was drunk and forced to return home to the police vehicle, and the victim refused to do so. At the seat of slope and E, the Defendant told the above victim “this head knife, and the same head knife is the police station, and the head knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

Accordingly, the Defendant insultd the victim D openly.

B. At around 22:40 on May 19, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the place indicated in paragraph (a) of Article 1, and as such, the Defendant demanded D, the security guards belonging to the Seocho Police Station C police station, to produce identification cards by committing an insulting crime. However, the Defendant continued to refuse such demand, thereby refusing to arrest the Defendant as an offender in the crime of insult, and thereby obstructing the Defendant from carrying the Defendant on the part of the patrol, by continuing to take a bath against D, and by preventing the Defendant from carrying out his chests in front of the patrol.

2. On May 19, 2015, at around 22:40, the Defendant: (a) was at the place indicated in paragraph (1) of Article 1; (b) was found to have attempted to arrest Category A as an offender in the crime of insult; and (c) the Defendant prevented the Defendant from spreading Category D’s arms attached to A several times; and (d) obstructed the police officer’s lawful performance of duties in relation to the duties to arrest and patrol, etc. of flagrant offenders of the said D, by preventing the Defendant from spreading D’s arms attached to A on several occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of Defendant A’s legal statement and Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. E statements;

1. The investigation report (to listen to the F phone statement of the shote).

arrow